<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Facilitate Proceedings &#187; Process design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://facilitate.com/blog/index.php/tag/process-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://facilitate.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 01:46:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Death by PowerPoint or Web Conferencing?</title>
		<link>http://facilitate.com/blog/index.php/2010/04/death-by-powerpoint-or-web-conferencing/</link>
		<comments>http://facilitate.com/blog/index.php/2010/04/death-by-powerpoint-or-web-conferencing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 18:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julia Young</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interactive webinars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online collaboration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Process design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Running Effective Meetings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtual Meetings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://facilitate.com/blog/?p=1421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York Times reports on Death by PowerPoint in the US Military. Is web conferencing going the same way?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New York Times reports on Death by PowerPoint in the US Military. Is web conferencing going the same way?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://facilitate.com/blog/index.php/2010/04/death-by-powerpoint-or-web-conferencing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Facilitators Must Practice Tough Love</title>
		<link>http://facilitate.com/blog/index.php/2009/07/why-facilitators-must-practice-tough-love/</link>
		<comments>http://facilitate.com/blog/index.php/2009/07/why-facilitators-must-practice-tough-love/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 17:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>R. Sridhar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Facilitation Tips and Techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feature Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effective Facilitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Process design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Running Effective Meetings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://facilitate.com/blog/?p=642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em><span style="color: #515151;"><strong><span style="color: #5e5e5e;">“What if we follow a different process instead of what you have told us?”</span></strong></span></em>

How do you respond to this suggestion, in the middle of a session, as a facilitator? This is a dangerous trap, but I realized it only after I got into it.

<em><strong><span style="color: #5e5e5e;">“Sure what do you have in mind?”</span></strong></em>

The participant explained his view. Soon enough the situation became a free for all and finally my client, who was the senior most person in the group, intervened and suggested a process step, something he does all the time in regular meetings. By that time I had lost control and I acquiesced. As you can imagine, the session was a disaster. My client was unhappy and I was miserable.

This happened years ago. After nine years in the business I do not fall into this trap any more. I have realized that as a facilitator, I can be open minded and listen to various views but I must stick to my process. The bottom line is this. I must know why I chose a particular process step and why it will deliver the goods. Here's what to do when your process is under fire.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><span style="color: #515151;"><strong><span style="color: #5e5e5e;">“What if we follow a different process instead of what you have told us?”</span></strong></span></em></p>
<p>How do you respond to this suggestion, in the middle of a session, as a facilitator? This is a dangerous trap, but I realized it only after I got into it.</p>
<p><em><strong><span style="color: #5e5e5e;">“Sure what do you have in mind?”</span></strong></em></p>
<p>The participant explained his view. Soon enough the situation became a free for all and finally my client, who was the senior most person in the group, intervened and suggested a process step, something he does all the time in regular meetings. By that time I had lost control and I acquiesced. As you can imagine, the session was a disaster. My client was unhappy and I was miserable.</p>
<p>This happened years ago. After nine years in the business I do not fall into this trap any more. I have realized that as a facilitator, I can be open minded and listen to various views but I must stick to my process. The bottom line is this. I must know why I chose a particular process step and why it will deliver the goods. Here&#8217;s what to do when your process is under fire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://facilitate.com/blog/index.php/2009/07/why-facilitators-must-practice-tough-love/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
