<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Engage Event Participants to Generate Bottom-line Results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://facilitate.com/blog/index.php/2009/09/engag-event-participants-to-generate-bottom-line-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://facilitate.com/blog/index.php/2009/09/engag-event-participants-to-generate-bottom-line-results/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 21:17:00 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Do You Allocate Enough Time For Interaction? &#171; Interactive Meeting Technology</title>
		<link>http://facilitate.com/blog/index.php/2009/09/engag-event-participants-to-generate-bottom-line-results/comment-page-1/#comment-1104</link>
		<dc:creator>Do You Allocate Enough Time For Interaction? &#171; Interactive Meeting Technology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 08:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://facilitate.com/blog/?p=854#comment-1104</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia Young</title>
		<link>http://facilitate.com/blog/index.php/2009/09/engag-event-participants-to-generate-bottom-line-results/comment-page-1/#comment-999</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 20:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://facilitate.com/blog/?p=854#comment-999</guid>
		<description>Doug - Interesting question. The FacilitatePro software that Ron mentions was chosen for a particular focused purpose - to allow multiple people/tables to contribute to a shared repository of ideas simultaneously, in a way that was immediately available for the panelists or facilitators to see or to share across the whole room/virtual meeting space, so that it could be organized, consolidated and then prioritized by the whole group leading to the selection of two go forward ideas. This mirrored a paper process that The Disney Institute typically uses with the added benefit that there was nothing to type up at the end – all the ideas, categories and prioritize were fully documented as we went.

A tool like Twitter obviously has some collaboration capabilities and is a useful way of messaging between individuals and from one person to a following of many people. It would be fun in a separate post to share ideas for how a messaging tool such as Twitter has been successfully used to support a group conference. In Ron&#039;s example, however, the facilitators were designing in much more than quick messaging - this was a large group decision making process that went well beyond simple brainstorming.

We have posted some descriptions of other group processes (with and without technology) in our Facilitator ToolKit at http://www.facilitate.com/support/facilitator-toolkit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug &#8211; Interesting question. The FacilitatePro software that Ron mentions was chosen for a particular focused purpose &#8211; to allow multiple people/tables to contribute to a shared repository of ideas simultaneously, in a way that was immediately available for the panelists or facilitators to see or to share across the whole room/virtual meeting space, so that it could be organized, consolidated and then prioritized by the whole group leading to the selection of two go forward ideas. This mirrored a paper process that The Disney Institute typically uses with the added benefit that there was nothing to type up at the end – all the ideas, categories and prioritize were fully documented as we went.</p>
<p>A tool like Twitter obviously has some collaboration capabilities and is a useful way of messaging between individuals and from one person to a following of many people. It would be fun in a separate post to share ideas for how a messaging tool such as Twitter has been successfully used to support a group conference. In Ron&#8217;s example, however, the facilitators were designing in much more than quick messaging &#8211; this was a large group decision making process that went well beyond simple brainstorming.</p>
<p>We have posted some descriptions of other group processes (with and without technology) in our Facilitator ToolKit at <a href="http://www.facilitate.com/support/facilitator-toolkit." rel="nofollow">http://www.facilitate.com/support/facilitator-toolkit.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Caldwell</title>
		<link>http://facilitate.com/blog/index.php/2009/09/engag-event-participants-to-generate-bottom-line-results/comment-page-1/#comment-994</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Caldwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 01:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://facilitate.com/blog/?p=854#comment-994</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing as it gave me some interesting ideas.  In lieu of facilitate.com, could one creatively use Twitter and 3d party applications to achieve same results?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing as it gave me some interesting ideas.  In lieu of facilitate.com, could one creatively use Twitter and 3d party applications to achieve same results?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
